Comparison
Looking for a Otter.ai alternative?
A long-established transcription service, historically bot-based, now also offering desktop capture.
Every price and feature below was checked on 2026-08-09 against the source named beside it. Things change — tell us if something here is out of date.
When Otter.ai is the better choice
- The widest platform coverage in the category, including a genuinely capable Android app.
- The cheapest annual price of any paid tier here at $8.33.
- A large, well-tested product with years of accumulated reliability.
Where we differ
- No bot ever joins a call, and disclosure state is recorded per meeting.
- Model training is off unless you turn it on.
- Transcription runs on your own device and the audio is never uploaded, so there is no transcription-minutes meter to run out of.
Side by side
| Otter.ai | Us | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, web and a Chrome extension.otter.ai · checked 2026-08-09 | The web app and installable PWA, on desktop and phone browsers. A macOS client and an iOS/Android app exist in source but are not distributed. |
| Price | Pro at $16.99/month, or $8.33 billed annually.otter.ai/pricing · checked 2026-08-09 | An unlimited free tier, then Pro $15/month ($12/month billed annually) for the parts that need a server. No Team or Enterprise plan. The pricing page says whether checkout is open. |
| Free tier | 300 transcription minutes per month.otter.ai/pricing · checked 2026-08-09 | — |
| Languages | English, Spanish and French documented in the help centre.Otter help centre · checked 2026-08-09 | English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, French, German, Japanese, Portuguese, Italian and Arabic, for capture, dictation and reading, with the original always kept. Recognition of dense code-switching within a sentence is not measured. |
| Litigation | Defendant in a consolidated federal class action alleging its notetaker recorded people who were not Otter users without consent. Argued May 2026; no ruling as of this date.N.D. Cal. consolidated action, public docket · checked 2026-08-09 | — |
What we do not do
- We launched in September 2026. The web app and installable PWA are live and you can use them now; every product we compare against has years of production history and we have days. There is no independent track record to check yet.
- No diarization. No engine we use separates speakers, we do not store voiceprints as a matter of policy, and speaker names are typed by the user. Wispr pulls real names off the calendar invite; on this one they are simply better and it is the most visible thing we lack.
- No system-wide dictation you can install today. Dictate works inside the browser tab and installed app, and you copy or share the result; the macOS client that types where your cursor is exists in source but is not distributed. Wispr Flow types into any app on four platforms.
- No native app is distributed. The product is a web app and an installable PWA; the macOS scaffold compiles but ships to nobody. On-device transcription therefore needs a browser with WebGPU or WASM rather than a Mac, which is a wider net than it sounds, but it is not a native app.
- On-device transcription costs a one-time model download before the first meeting, and runs slower on a weak machine than a datacentre GPU would. That is the trade we are making for never uploading your audio; we state it rather than hiding it.
- Newer and smaller than every product on this page, with no track record to point at.
Try it on one meeting
Record your next call with both tools and compare the transcripts. It is the only comparison that settles anything.
Open the app