对比
在寻找 Otter.ai 的替代方案？
A long-established transcription service, historically bot-based, now also offering desktop capture.
下方每项价格和功能都已于 2026-08-09 对照其旁边注明的来源进行核实。情况会变化——如果这里有过时的内容，请告诉我们。
Otter.ai 是更好选择的情况
- The widest platform coverage in the category, including a genuinely capable Android app.
- The cheapest annual price of any paid tier here at $8.33.
- A large, well-tested product with years of accumulated reliability.
我们的不同之处
- No bot ever joins a call, and disclosure state is recorded per meeting.
- Model training is off unless you turn it on.
- Transcription runs on your own device and the audio is never uploaded, so there is no transcription-minutes meter to run out of.
并排比较
| Otter.ai | 我们 | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, web and a Chrome extension.otter.ai · 已于 2026-08-09 核实 | The web app and installable PWA, on desktop and phone browsers. A macOS client and an iOS/Android app exist in source but are not distributed. |
| Price | Pro at $16.99/month, or $8.33 billed annually.otter.ai/pricing · 已于 2026-08-09 核实 | An unlimited free tier, then Pro $15/month ($12/month billed annually) for the parts that need a server. No Team or Enterprise plan. The pricing page says whether checkout is open. |
| Free tier | 300 transcription minutes per month.otter.ai/pricing · 已于 2026-08-09 核实 | — |
| Languages | English, Spanish and French documented in the help centre.Otter help centre · 已于 2026-08-09 核实 | English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, French, German, Japanese, Portuguese, Italian and Arabic, for capture, dictation and reading, with the original always kept. Recognition of dense code-switching within a sentence is not measured. |
| Litigation | Defendant in a consolidated federal class action alleging its notetaker recorded people who were not Otter users without consent. Argued May 2026; no ruling as of this date.N.D. Cal. consolidated action, public docket · 已于 2026-08-09 核实 | — |
我们不做的事
- We launched in September 2026. The web app and installable PWA are live and you can use them now; every product we compare against has years of production history and we have days. There is no independent track record to check yet.
- No diarization. No engine we use separates speakers, we do not store voiceprints as a matter of policy, and speaker names are typed by the user. Wispr pulls real names off the calendar invite; on this one they are simply better and it is the most visible thing we lack.
- No system-wide dictation you can install today. Dictate works inside the browser tab and installed app, and you copy or share the result; the macOS client that types where your cursor is exists in source but is not distributed. Wispr Flow types into any app on four platforms.
- No native app is distributed. The product is a web app and an installable PWA; the macOS scaffold compiles but ships to nobody. On-device transcription therefore needs a browser with WebGPU or WASM rather than a Mac, which is a wider net than it sounds, but it is not a native app.
- On-device transcription costs a one-time model download before the first meeting, and runs slower on a weak machine than a datacentre GPU would. That is the trade we are making for never uploading your audio; we state it rather than hiding it.
- Newer and smaller than every product on this page, with no track record to point at.
先用一场会议试试
用两款工具同时录制您的下一次通话，然后比较转录。这是唯一能说明问题的比较。
打开应用