Vergleich
Suchen Sie eine Alternative zu Fathom?
A meeting notetaker offering both a bot and a bot-free desktop capture mode.
Jeder Preis und jede Funktion unten wurde am 2026-08-09 anhand der daneben genannten Quelle geprüft. Dinge ändern sich – sagen Sie uns Bescheid, wenn hier etwas veraltet ist.
Wann Fathom die bessere Wahl ist
- An unlimited free tier that is shipping today and has been for years, where ours is unlimited but pre-launch. Free and available beats free and promised.
- Outstanding user satisfaction: 5.0 on G2 across thousands of reviews.
- A choice of bot or bot-free capture, per meeting.
Worin wir uns unterscheiden
- Android.
- Training is off by default rather than opt-out.
- Cross-language meetings.
- Transcription runs on your own device and the audio is never uploaded — Fathom's free tier is unlimited too, but the recording still goes to their servers.
Im direkten Vergleich
| Fathom | Wir | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | macOS, Windows and web. No Android app.fathom.ai · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | The web app and installable PWA, on desktop and phone browsers. A macOS client and an iOS/Android app exist in source but are not distributed. |
| Price | Premium at $20/month, or $16 billed annually.fathom.ai/pricing · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | An unlimited free tier, then Pro $15/month ($12/month billed annually) for the parts that need a server. No Team or Enterprise plan. The pricing page says whether checkout is open. |
| Free tier | Unlimited recording and transcription.fathom.ai/pricing · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | — |
| Model training | Uses de-identified customer data to improve its own models, with an opt-out in settings.Fathom security documentation · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | Off unless you turn it on. |
Was wir nicht tun
- We launched in September 2026. The web app and installable PWA are live and you can use them now; every product we compare against has years of production history and we have days. There is no independent track record to check yet.
- No diarization. No engine we use separates speakers, we do not store voiceprints as a matter of policy, and speaker names are typed by the user. Wispr pulls real names off the calendar invite; on this one they are simply better and it is the most visible thing we lack.
- No system-wide dictation you can install today. Dictate works inside the browser tab and installed app, and you copy or share the result; the macOS client that types where your cursor is exists in source but is not distributed. Wispr Flow types into any app on four platforms.
- No native app is distributed. The product is a web app and an installable PWA; the macOS scaffold compiles but ships to nobody. On-device transcription therefore needs a browser with WebGPU or WASM rather than a Mac, which is a wider net than it sounds, but it is not a native app.
- On-device transcription costs a one-time model download before the first meeting, and runs slower on a weak machine than a datacentre GPU would. That is the trade we are making for never uploading your audio; we state it rather than hiding it.
- Newer and smaller than every product on this page, with no track record to point at.
Testen Sie es mit einer Besprechung
Nehmen Sie Ihren nächsten Anruf mit beiden Tools auf und vergleichen Sie die Transkripte. Das ist der einzige Vergleich, der wirklich etwas entscheidet.
App öffnen