Vergleich
Suchen Sie eine Alternative zu Fireflies.ai?
A bot-based meeting assistant aimed at sales and revenue teams.
Jeder Preis und jede Funktion unten wurde am 2026-08-09 anhand der daneben genannten Quelle geprüft. Dinge ändern sich – sagen Sie uns Bescheid, wenn hier etwas veraltet ist.
Wann Fireflies.ai die bessere Wahl ist
- The deepest CRM integration set in the category, and real conversation-intelligence features for sales teams.
- The broadest claimed language coverage at 100+.
- Profitable and well established, which matters when you are picking a vendor.
Worin wir uns unterscheiden
- No bot in the participant list.
- AI features are not metered by a credit pool.
- Transcription runs on your own device and the audio is never uploaded.
Im direkten Vergleich
| Fireflies.ai | Wir | |
|---|---|---|
| Capture | A bot joins the call as a visible participant.fireflies.ai · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | — |
| Price | Pro at $18/month, or $10 billed annually. Business at $29/$19.fireflies.ai/pricing · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | An unlimited free tier, then Pro $15/month ($12/month billed annually) for the parts that need a server. No Team or Enterprise plan. The pricing page says whether checkout is open. |
| Languages | 100+ claimed, with automatic detection.fireflies.ai · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, French, German, Japanese, Portuguese, Italian and Arabic, for capture, dictation and reading, with the original always kept. Recognition of dense code-switching within a sentence is not measured. |
| AI limits | Advanced AI features draw on a capped credit pool even on paid tiers.fireflies.ai/pricing · geprüft am 2026-08-09 | — |
Was wir nicht tun
- We launched in September 2026. The web app and installable PWA are live and you can use them now; every product we compare against has years of production history and we have days. There is no independent track record to check yet.
- No diarization. No engine we use separates speakers, we do not store voiceprints as a matter of policy, and speaker names are typed by the user. Wispr pulls real names off the calendar invite; on this one they are simply better and it is the most visible thing we lack.
- No system-wide dictation you can install today. Dictate works inside the browser tab and installed app, and you copy or share the result; the macOS client that types where your cursor is exists in source but is not distributed. Wispr Flow types into any app on four platforms.
- No native app is distributed. The product is a web app and an installable PWA; the macOS scaffold compiles but ships to nobody. On-device transcription therefore needs a browser with WebGPU or WASM rather than a Mac, which is a wider net than it sounds, but it is not a native app.
- On-device transcription costs a one-time model download before the first meeting, and runs slower on a weak machine than a datacentre GPU would. That is the trade we are making for never uploading your audio; we state it rather than hiding it.
- Newer and smaller than every product on this page, with no track record to point at.
Testen Sie es mit einer Besprechung
Nehmen Sie Ihren nächsten Anruf mit beiden Tools auf und vergleichen Sie die Transkripte. Das ist der einzige Vergleich, der wirklich etwas entscheidet.
App öffnen